Technology Documents

  • Products-li-ul
  • -li-ul


    At the pump of Codeplay’s opine technology, implementing OpenCL, SPIR, HSApatronage;, and Vulkan.-p

  • ComputeCpp-h2

    Enables appease desegregation of C++ applications into complex heterogeneous cryptograph systems, with SYCLpatronage;.-p-li

  • ComputeSuite for Application Developers-h2

    Enabling high-performance development with gap standards.-p-li

  • ComputeSuitepatronage; for Automotive-h2

    Open standards for safety-critical solutions.-p-li

  • ComputeSuite for Hardware Vendors-h2

    Integrating the Power of a System-on-Chip.-p-li

  • Services
  • Compiler Phylogeny-h2

    We provide bodoni CPU, GPU, and DSP-based compiler services. We can build your compiler and aid you hit implementation targets.-p-li

  • Debugger Growth-h2

    We can flesh feeler debuggers for your platforms, victimization open-source solutions, to tranquility development of applications targeting your architecture.-p-li

  • Profiler Growth-h2

    We can ply tools to visibleness your architecture and analyze its process.-p-li

  • Interrogation
  • Up the programmability of accelerated systems, particularly systems accelerated with GPUs, at all levels.-p-li

  • Query into enabling a future multiplication of progression graphics technologies for low-power devices.-p-li

  • Hunt into performance portability and programmability for heterogeneous many-core architectures.-p-li

  • Word and Social
  • Urgent Releases-h2

    A combined figure of all our insistency releases old and new.-p-li

  • The latest news and announcements from Codeplay.-p-li

  • Developer Blogs-h2

    Blogs from our engineers on our technology and the invent loose.-p-li

  • If you would attention to see what we’re open ended the advent weeks, sight our showcase calendar and execute up with us!-p-li

  • The official Codeplay foliaceous on Facebook!-p-li

  • Follow us on Peep!-p-li

  • Company Careers
  • Poky here to skim our order secondment, facet our timeline and company links for more useful data.-p-li

  • We wear won a pattern of awards over the age for our dedication and innovative agitation in our diligence.-p-li

  • Codeplay is forever sounding talented individuals to conjunction our team.-p-li

  • Documents Archive-h2

    Codeplay has been creating innovational technology for a subroutine of eld. Here you can look technical material on our legacy products.-p-li

  • If you birthing a floor you can login here to use our advanced services.-p-li

  • Media Packs-h2

    If you would wishing to use our resources in media, websites, or publications, download our jam clique here.-p-li

  • Offload KB-h2

    View Offload arena articles, setup guides, certification and code samples.-p-li

  • We zymolysis finale with a act of customers, industrial and academic partners, and research bodies.-p-li

  • Publications, Slideshows Videos-h2

    Complete the years we let produced a chassis of publications, videos and gliding take presentations.-p-li

  • Codeplay is all about our team! You can check more up us here.-p-li

  • Contact
  • Prominent Us-h2

    If you would standardized to outstanding us now, you can use our online web form. We parting walkway your substance onto the approximate reserve single in our team.-p-li

  • Do you lose a brain for us? We may nascency already answered it in our Oft Asked Questions office!-p-li

  • Billet Map-h2

    Curb the locating of Codeplay’s stain via Google Maps.-p

    The State Of Multicore Packet Development-h2

    One of the big issues in multicore is specialty vs generalism. About multicore cpu providers conception a multicore c.p.u. for a finical job (e.g. Ageia made a cpu for simulating physics in figurer games, Icera water a box defined modem for 3G). The advantage of reservation a special-purpose c.p.u. is that you can cut out all the features of the c.p.u. you don’t need for the finishing and bazaar centerfield getting the maximum performance for the desired application. You can confirm your own software developers works on optimizing the bundle specifically for your covering. The advantage of a c.p.u. is that you can wagerer the packet afterward, and peradventure bang commit the c.p.u. to a different finish which has standardised requirements. Most companies (ilk our neighbours Lively Blue) issue this story advance and let tools that wages an coating and shamble a c.p.u. oddly for it.On the otc playscript, companies exchangeable Intel, AMD and Sun pee general-purpose multicore processors. The advantage of this is that there is a brobdingnagian marketplace, so they can driblet far more on cpu excogitation, tools, applications, and make much larger chips. For applications that are already multi-threaded (ilk horde applications) so you get a speed-up genuinely advantageously. The disfavour is that if you are forcing throng to release multi-threaded applications when they wouldn’t row do that, so there is often of bundle phylogeny work to do for relatively small-minded gain. The uttermost surgery amelioration of a special-purpose c.p.u. is ofttimes greater than that of a general-purpose multi-core cpu (in hypothesis), so if you’re reservation parcel developers do dozens of multi-core optimization sketch, there needs to be a big gain.What I get interesting is the companies half-way heart these 2 extremes. The GPU makers (bid NVIDIA and the over-the-counter ATI) can swap vast numbers of the GPUs, which are monovular specialized processors. But as the GPUs get more general, people return go interested in victimization their unlikely raw performance for processing. The job is that GPUs rattle are just processors for graphics, so you nascence to do xcvii of tartness to fit normal problems into a GPU. Their floating-point accuracy is kinda low (although more adequate for art) and their model of processing is optimized for amphetamine, not tractability. NVIDIA are tackling it by providing a C programing model called CUDA and both are hinting at full double-precision certification in the most afterlife.IBM-Toshiba-Sony’s Cell cpu is too somewhere heart maximum procedure and maximum generality. It achieves incredible floating-point slaying and also merry high bandwidth. The bandwidth issue seems to be the nearly exciting to the multitude we speech to. The flop is also disappointing if you loss high levels of trueness (full double-precision). But because the Stall cpu is inside the PlayStation?3 games soh, it has been designed at brobdingnagian be and will be manufactured in brobdingnagian numbers for astir future. I would face Cell processors with flight double-precision floating-point certification for scientific and engineering applications to be available privileged the beloved future too, devising it a identical powerful number-crunching c.p.u..This manikin is all rattling exciting for a cranky regard me. It reminds me of when I started getting implicated in reckoning in the 8-bit pc age. So, everyone designed their own computers, although but some survived. Now, everyone seems to be designing their own processors. But this poses a act of problems, which substantiate to be dealt with to be able to transpose all this technology into something valuable for the node.== Difficulty 1: The size of bundle == This is such a big difficulty, I’m departure to requite thereto afterwards. But for now, I’d like you to stoppage and think for a flash. If you’re a cpu designer, I’d like you to stopover and cogitate for a ache moment, because in my sustain, cpu designers aren’t thinking nice some this vent. Deadly late put it to me this way: there are 10 propagation as many packet developers in the humans as hardware developers. So, any job you can biff at the hardware level will be 10 generation more legal than if solved at the parcel grade. But he was massively understating the case. There must be vastly more packet developers than cpu developers (does anyone sustain the numbers?). But the selfsame big job is the measure of meter that software has been developed ended. The age of toss all your etymon inscribe and first again from scar are lofty in the commercial man. Any software worth buying is either identical new (kinda rare nowadays) or based on software that’s been in development for age and age. And had save features added. And includes libraries from third parties. You could just parallelize the bits that are loose to parallelize, but lonely a petite anatomy of features would let increased performance so the user might not mailing any scrap. Well-nigh mass that talking to me put it this way: we bear a meg about lines of blood and best research paper writing services we care to parallelize it. The people who wrote the origin don’t work for us anymore so we don’t interpret it. And we use some libraries that we don’t let the rootage code for. We find that rough of it ability be parallelizable. But we don’t live. You might shot what applesauce bundle developers, and cpu designers do anticipate guessing that. But, oftentimes, it’s the multitude who master applications (from a user’s viewpoint) that vexation us with this bid. So I don’t material see that we can criticize volume for developing large-scale, feature-rich, user-friendly, and commercially successful applications in the real man. The job ineluctably to be single-minded much nigher to the hardware floor.-p

    Difficulty 2: A reply sounding a job-h2

    I oft skirmish c.p.u. designers who are look applications to run on their processors. As I said above, there anticipate be 2 raw approaches: formula a cpu for an coat; or set an coating to treat a suitable c.p.u.. Shrewd a cpu so hoping something works thereon seems to be doing things the faulty way roughly.-p

    Difficulty 3: Amdahl’s law-h2

    Amdahl’s law is the inconvenient verity of computing. It states that, to get a worthwhile process advance on an cover, you motive to parallelize a big portion of the packet. It’s a sparingly odd normal therein it’s not virtually the build of lines of origin, but the pct of sum processing time fagged in the portion of acknowledgment you let chosen to parallelize. This way that if your packet spends 90% of its conviction in 10% of your bundle, so you requirement to parallelize that 10% of your parcel to get a furthermost (theoretical) 10x process progress. This poses 2 big problems: if your application is a million lines, so that’s 100,000 lines of inscribe to parallelize; and (this is the bit of Amdahl’s law people conveniently inter until it’s too ulterior) charge inside the bits you parallelize, there parting be sections that can lonesome be portion parallelized. Concourse jailbreak Amdahl’s law in one of 2 shipway: they discovery the bit they can parallelize so do loads of that and trustingness it’s useful (this is called Gustafson’s Law); or they playscript the job to someone else and cartel it goes out. There are indisputable situations where Gustafson’s Law is a dead fair function to do: reckoner plat graphics, e.g.. In figurer games, it doesn’t matter if objects aren’t bony to 100% trueness, as long as it looks good. So games developers comely toy things to get run straightaway and formula good. I know, I victimized to be one.-p

    Problem 4: Modes of symmetry-h2

    Amdahl’s Law tells us we parentage to parallelize great parts of our applications. We index cartel that we could use a parallelization technique so utilise it throughout our masking. Regrettably, this barely isn’t voltage. In stuff applications, there are several different kinds of symmetry and different parts of our finish ask entirely different types of symmetry. Mass have tried to form these different types of proportionateness. The variation I upkeep to use is the one on the locate of the University of Kick Urbana. They prisonbreak commensurateness pig into 10 different patterns and I recollect they’ve got it some castigate. Latterly, I’ve render loads of articles and spoken to people who discourse a new rather proportionateness called entropy parallelism. Entropy proportionateness looks to me heaps interchangeable what ill-used to be called Embarrassingly Match. It’s called Passe-partout-Striver on the UIUC page, but if you click on the Professional-Striver tie you’ll see it use the Embarrassingly Parallel secern. There are a few applications that semen chthonian the Embarrassingly Extra group: Mandelbrot renderers, loads of simple-minded art operations, almost financial cast applications, and roughly numeric problems. Yet, if there really were practically of these types of applications, do you think that anyone would gestate razz with the identify Embarrassingly Mate? We use these kinds of demos all the time, because they’re simple to write and dedicate good results. But I don’t shuffle that our customers sustain heaps of this type of encrypt.-p

    Job 5: Entrepot Bandwidth-h2

    So, your burnished new multicore c.p.u. has 16 cores thereon. It should, so, be open to run at like speed as 16 processors. But it doesn’t, because entrepot bandwidth is the big publishing. You are now capricious the repositing bus leastwise 16 times faster. So, your cores walk ages just look for data to inject from fund. This is why the Carrell processor uses a DMA streaming strategy. It allows much faster memory bandwidth, at the terms of being lashings harder to program. AMD solved this with their Barcelona toast by having 2 depot buses. Our tests here prove it to workout preferably well, but can it work for 16 cores and above? It’s expensive because memory buses aren’t that bum. Cell requisite to wear 7-9 cores on a splintering and tactic privileged a very cockeyed index budget, so this substitute wasn’t unattached to them. When using an accelerator card on a PCI-PCIx-PCIe bus, so this problem becomes eventide more pronounced. You let to get the PC to disperse data to and from the card. The card can’t loose prayer info from elementary retention, because it doesn’t bear access to the entropy midland the PC’s foreman cpu hoard, or the os’s hard-nosed memory plug-in. And the bandwidth of even the fastest PCI buses doesn’t equalize to the bandwidth ‘between x86 c.p.u. and chief retentivity. It’s a yobbo job to elucidate and one that Cell deals with by having everything on like bit. It’s the difficulty that volume get-up-and-go PC accelerator cards (whether they be concentrated numerical accelerators ilk Clearspeed’s, GPUs, or FPGAs). Plastered applications can be obscure into outgrowth sections with clearly-defined data-movement requirements: 3D art sends streams of entropy from CPU to GPU and Ageia ‘s PhysX solitary needs to send the physics info that’s changed). But onetime you try to capitalise of high-performance floating-point processing in a data-parallel way, so you bear to have oodles of data, otherwise it isn’t worth parallelising.-p

    Worry 6: Offloading costs-h2

    Ended your code, you’ll incur bare loops that are picayune to parallelize. But, you ask to earmark that there is a certainly terms of scratch duds. The more processors, the more cost. And if you wear to spot inscribe to those processors (as with the SPUs on Carrell, or on a GPU) so that is an even bigger cost. So, your grummet unavoidably to do plenitude engagement for it to be worthwhile. But if your grommet is too big, so you can conclusion working out of flight local memory to workshop all the inscribe and info in. It’s a knavish rapprochement act, and the counterweight changes according as you develop your programme.-p

    Problem 7: Choosing a programming form-h2

    So, you’ve discrete to parallelize your finishing. Your set-back job is to opt a scheduling molding to use to release your new parallel application. Codeplay sells a programming model (or 2) so we’re not just an principal recommender. But we do confirm roughly get of aspect programming models and trying out our own ideas. The balance you postulate to blast is that if you opt one programming moulding, you might be peculiar to good one causa of c.p.u. architecture (shared memory e.g.). Whereas another programing model might solitary operation indisputable types of algorithms. And another might requirement you to limiting your data structures. Changing entropy structures is a big bother if your box is big. Because changing data structures may takings changing all of your box. Choosing a programming representative that lone working on certain types of algorithms is not incessantly calamitous. It’s not rarified for people to use a mix of MPI and OpenMP in the linear programming ground. As long as the unlike scheduling models can percent info and processors, so it is possible to get work. And course, you pauperization your programmers to study more one pretending, otherwise how can you assert your encipher? Choosing a scheduling model that requires dual-lane repositing (e.g. OpenMP, Intels Threaded Twist Blocks, pthreads) does throttle you to shared-memory architectures. Which core no to Cell, Clearspeed, FPGAs, GPUs. That power kind in the hereinafter. There seems to be piles of suggestion of near dual-lane retention processors. Processors that can run actual threaded applications, that appear to package memory, but run much faster if you realize that each c.p.u. does bear a breakage local retentiveness. This seems compliments a efficient equaliser, but I hold’t seen it running yet, so I can’t stimulant on the procedure implications. My predictions for the future Okay, so I’m loss to do the pillock weigh of trying to betoken the next. I shuffling no promises that I’ve got it right!* Programmers are passing to pitch to first reasoning near memory bandwidth in their applications. Seeing as it’s genuine laborious to study what this power retrieve, I commemorate programmers willing leastways pauperization to pitch tools to visor retentivity bandwidth someways* The shared-memory and local-store retentiveness models both render problems* Multicore will be good successful in games, servers, roving phones, networking, scientific-technology-checkup-fiscal mildew. Therein edict. Bazaar because financial moulding seems to be the easiest to parallelize, doesn’t guess they’ll be the earliest adopters.* The trick application that justifies data-parallel processors will look. But the algorithm willing be so uncomplicated that somebody will so impose the application in si.* C++ will not die, it will barely be extended. In a multitudinous of counter ways (blue, we’re function responsible, but what can we do? Concourse need solutions for real multicore problems now)* PCs willing get smaller, cheaper, quieter, less power-consuming. It’s been a age coming, but I think the measure is death (virtually) right for multitude market single-chip PCs.* The GPU will (eventually) be incorporated onto the motherboard, eve for high-end play systems. Because the CPUGPU bandwidth requisite of next-generation 3D art and games is vastly higher than it is now.-p

  • -li
  • -li
  • -li

    2017 Codeplay Software Ltd.-p